{
  "generated_at": "2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",
  "source_sha256": "b7633f732437b71d37c215a03b19abfa8c91d45411579d976d6a926a0140339a",
  "atoms": [
    {
      "checked_at": "2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",
      "claim_id": "claim:vs--acacia-vs-psyllium:comparison.potency",
      "denominator": 1301,
      "denominator_status": "ok",
      "denominator_unit": "observed label versions",
      "entity_id": "comparison:acacia-vs-psyllium",
      "number": 83,
      "page_id": "vs--acacia-vs-psyllium",
      "provenance": "organism_rows.csv",
      "query": "per-side observed label IDs with through_expiry",
      "query_commit": "90a5050d2327baae3d738638237b48fb29cb01b0",
      "query_id": "comparison.potency",
      "query_links": [],
      "rows_after_dedupe": 83,
      "rows_before_dedupe": 1301,
      "rule_id": "comparison.potency",
      "sentence": "acacia states through_expiry on 83 of 1,301 observed labels (6.4%), compared with 29 of 836 (3.5%) for psyllium. Window: NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026.",
      "snapshot_hash": "b7633f732437b71d37c215a03b19abfa8c91d45411579d976d6a926a0140339a",
      "status": "ok",
      "template_id": "comparison.potency",
      "values_json": "{\"denominator\": 1301, \"labels\": \"labels in the NIH DSLD snapshot (Sep 2026)\", \"left\": \"acacia\", \"name\": \"acacia vs psyllium\", \"number\": 83, \"right\": \"psyllium\", \"right_d\": 836, \"right_n\": 29, \"right_share\": \"3.5%\", \"share\": \"6.4%\", \"window\": \"NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026\"}",
      "window": "NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026"
    },
    {
      "checked_at": "2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",
      "claim_id": "claim:vs--acacia-vs-psyllium:comparison.evidence",
      "denominator": 178,
      "denominator_status": "ok",
      "denominator_unit": "PubMed records in the union of both compared entries, of which 7 are shared by the two",
      "entity_id": "comparison:acacia-vs-psyllium",
      "number": 41,
      "page_id": "vs--acacia-vs-psyllium",
      "provenance": "evidence_ledger.csv; sku_evidence.csv",
      "query": "selected evidence source and status independently for each comparison side",
      "query_commit": "90a5050d2327baae3d738638237b48fb29cb01b0",
      "query_id": "comparison.evidence",
      "query_links": [
        {
          "label": "acacia PubMed query",
          "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%28%28%28%22acacia%22%5Bti%5D%20OR%20%22acacia%20fiber%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22gum%20arabic%22%5Btiab%5D%29%29%29%20AND%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%5Bpt%5D%20AND%20humans%5Bmh%5D%20NOT%20%28retracted%20publication%5Bpt%5D%20OR%20retraction%20of%20publication%5Bpt%5D%29"
        },
        {
          "label": "psyllium PubMed query",
          "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%28%28%28%22blond%20psyllium%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22psyllium%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22psyllium%20husk%22%5Btiab%5D%29%29%29%20AND%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%5Bpt%5D%20AND%20humans%5Bmh%5D%20NOT%20%28retracted%20publication%5Bpt%5D%20OR%20retraction%20of%20publication%5Bpt%5D%29"
        }
      ],
      "rows_after_dedupe": 41,
      "rows_before_dedupe": 178,
      "rule_id": "comparison.evidence",
      "sentence": "acacia: 41 PubMed records indexed as human randomized controlled trials match the published query (as of 2026-09-15). 41 records (retracted records excluded; 5 retracted records match the query separately). psyllium: 144 PubMed records indexed as human randomized controlled trials match the published query (as of 2026-09-15). 144 records (retracted records excluded; 0 retracted records match the query separately).",
      "snapshot_hash": "b7633f732437b71d37c215a03b19abfa8c91d45411579d976d6a926a0140339a",
      "status": "ok",
      "template_id": "comparison.evidence",
      "values_json": "{\"denominator\": 178, \"labels\": \"labels in the NIH DSLD snapshot (Sep 2026)\", \"left\": \"acacia\", \"left_text\": \"41 PubMed records indexed as human randomized controlled trials match the published query (as of 2026-09-15). 41 records (retracted records excluded; 5 retracted records match the query separately).\", \"name\": \"acacia vs psyllium\", \"number\": 41, \"right\": \"psyllium\", \"right_n\": 144, \"right_status\": \"ok\", \"right_text\": \"144 PubMed records indexed as human randomized controlled trials match the published query (as of 2026-09-15). 144 records (retracted records excluded; 0 retracted records match the query separately).\", \"share\": \"23.0%\", \"window\": \"NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026\"}",
      "window": "NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026"
    },
    {
      "checked_at": "2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",
      "claim_id": "claim:vs--acacia-vs-psyllium:comparison.price",
      "denominator": 2,
      "denominator_status": "ok",
      "denominator_unit": "compared entries",
      "entity_id": "comparison:acacia-vs-psyllium",
      "number": 0,
      "page_id": "vs--acacia-vs-psyllium",
      "provenance": "prices.csv; measurements.csv",
      "query": "per-side price observation availability and dated source",
      "query_commit": "90a5050d2327baae3d738638237b48fb29cb01b0",
      "query_id": "comparison.price",
      "query_links": [],
      "rows_after_dedupe": 0,
      "rows_before_dedupe": 2,
      "rule_id": "comparison.price",
      "sentence": "0 of 2 compared entries have a numeric price: acacia, No numeric price observation is available in this release.; psyllium, No numeric price observation is available in this release.. Window: NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026.",
      "snapshot_hash": "b7633f732437b71d37c215a03b19abfa8c91d45411579d976d6a926a0140339a",
      "status": "ok",
      "template_id": "comparison.price",
      "values_json": "{\"denominator\": 2, \"labels\": \"labels in the NIH DSLD snapshot (Sep 2026)\", \"left\": \"acacia\", \"left_price\": \"No numeric price observation is available in this release.\", \"name\": \"acacia vs psyllium\", \"number\": 0, \"right\": \"psyllium\", \"right_price\": \"No numeric price observation is available in this release.\", \"share\": \"0.0%\", \"window\": \"NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026\"}",
      "window": "NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026"
    }
  ]
}