Gut Registry

editorial · release 2026-09-20

GIS sensitivity method

Structured fields rendered from the release dataset. Unknown values retain a reason; price is outside GIS.

Elsewhere in this release

Related pages

Findings computed over the whole corpus: Guide alliance footprint · Affiliate economics

Release method

GIS sensitivity method

The formula, cohort hash, alias tiers, and uncertainty rules are supplied by the release methodology object.

Cohort manifest hash: 3a8805d95e34cbd3ccdc36613e5bbcd4a75c17b7e07e420b65aa54f786a13400. The preference_sensitivity_interval varies weights, aggregation, and normalization. The rank_uncertainty_interval nests input-error draws. GIS remains a preference-dependent summary.

Preference tool

Weights slider

The readout recomputes the arithmetic summary from the published component JSON. Axis fields remain primary.

—

Citable atoms

Release claims

  1. 2 of 4 registry axes contribute to the probiotic Gut Index Score; nominal weights {"A1": 0.45, "A2": 0.55}. Window: NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026.

    2 / 4 registry axes · NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026 · method.axes · checked 2026-09-20T00:00:00Z · snapshot b7633f732437

  2. 3,279 of 12,327 observed formulation groups enter the probiotic scoring cohort (26.6%) in the NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026.

    3279 / 12327 observed formulation groups · NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026 · method.formulations · checked 2026-09-20T00:00:00Z · snapshot b7633f732437

  3. Of 4,101 scored probiotic labels in the NIH DSLD snapshot (Sep 2026), 681 (16.6%) were scored using the available matching evidence, compared with 3,420 scored with indexed evidence.

    681 / 4101 scored probiotic labels · NIH DSLD snapshot Sep 2026 · census.opacity · checked 2026-09-20T00:00:00Z · snapshot b7633f732437

Back to the release hub